Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers FD3
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 95.8 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers FD3 vs Bobcat CT1025
BobcatModel B
Bobcat CT1025
Utility
- power
- 24.5 hp
- displacement
- 69.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers FD3
vs
BobcatBobcat CT1025
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ FD3 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)FD325 hp
CT102524.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
FD3 is in the 16th percentile; CT1025 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FD3 higher · +26.7 ci (+39%)FD395.8 ci
CT102569.1 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
FD3 is in the 22nd percentile; CT1025 is in the 10th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ CT1025 higher · +1 (+50%)FD32
CT10253
Median Utility Tractor4
FD3 is in the 3rd percentile; CT1025 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ FD3 higher · +1,662 lb (+112%)FD33,150 lb
CT10251,488 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
FD3 is in the 25th percentile; CT1025 is in the 5th · 5,107 models
FD3 (A)CT1025 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Bobcat CT1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Bobcat | — |
| Model | FD3 | CT1025 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Bobcat CT1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Vendeuvre | Daedong | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Shibaura S733L | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 24.5hp | ▲ FD3+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ CT1025+800 RPM · +36% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ CT1025+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 95.8ci | 69.1ci | ▲ FD3+26.7 ci · +39% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 3in | ▲ FD3+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 3.2in | ▲ FD3+0.7 in · +22% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Bobcat CT1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Bobcat CT1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | 99.3in | ▲ FD3+12.7 in · +13% |
| Width | Not recorded | 46in | — |
| Height | 51.2in | 87.6in | ▲ CT1025+36.4 in · +71% |
| Operating Weight | 3,150lb | 1,488lb | ▲ FD3+1,662 lb · +112% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Bobcat CT1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type: I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Bobcat CT1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Bobcat CT1025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 22nd percentile (95.8 ci)B · 10th percentile (69.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 25th percentile (3,150 lb)B · 5th percentile (1,488 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 18th percentile (112 in)B · 8th percentile (99.3 in)
A · FD3B · CT1025Median Utility Tractor