Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers FD3
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 95.8 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers FD3 vs Kubota BX2670
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota BX2670
Utility
- power
- 25.5 hp
- displacement
- 61.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers FD3
vs
KubotaKubota BX2670
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ BX2670 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)FD325 hp
BX267025.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
FD3 is in the 16th percentile; BX2670 is in the 17th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FD3 higher · +34.7 ci (+57%)FD395.8 ci
BX267061.1 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
FD3 is in the 22nd percentile; BX2670 is in the 6th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ BX2670 higher · +1 (+50%)FD32
BX26703
Median Utility Tractor4
FD3 is in the 3rd percentile; BX2670 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ FD3 higher · +1,684 lb (+115%)FD33,150 lb
BX26701,466 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
FD3 is in the 25th percentile; BX2670 is in the 5th · 5,107 models
FD3 (A)BX2670 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota BX2670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Kubota | — |
| Model | FD3 | BX2670 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota BX2670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Vendeuvre | Kubota | — |
| Model | Not recorded | D1005 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25.5hp | ▲ BX2670+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 3,200RPM | ▲ BX2670+1,000 RPM · +45% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ BX2670+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 95.8ci | 61.1ci | ▲ FD3+34.7 ci · +57% |
| Bore | 3.1in | 3in | ▲ FD3+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 2.9in | ▲ FD3+1 in · +34% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota BX2670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota BX2670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | 95.5in | ▲ FD3+16.5 in · +17% |
| Width | Not recorded | 44.5in | — |
| Height | 51.2in | 87.2in | ▲ BX2670+36 in · +70% |
| Operating Weight | 3,150lb | 1,466lb | ▲ FD3+1,684 lb · +115% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota BX2670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota BX2670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 2,500rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota BX2670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,213lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota BX2670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota BX2670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota BX2670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 0.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD3 | Kubota BX2670 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post foldable ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 17th percentile (25.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 22nd percentile (95.8 ci)B · 6th percentile (61.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 25th percentile (3,150 lb)B · 5th percentile (1,466 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 18th percentile (112 in)B · 6th percentile (95.5 in)
A · FD3B · BX2670Median Utility Tractor