Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers FD5
Utility
- power
- 50 hp
- displacement
- 247 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers FD5 vs McCormick Intl X10.50H
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.50H
Utility
- power
- 49 hp
- displacement
- 149 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers FD5
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.50H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ FD5 higher · +1 hp (+2%)FD550 hp
X10.50H49 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
FD5 is in the 45th percentile; X10.50H is in the 44th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FD5 higher · +98 ci (+66%)FD5247 ci
X10.50H149 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
FD5 is in the 69th percentile; X10.50H is in the 38th · 5,580 models
Operating Weight
▲ FD5 higher · +1,477 lb (+38%)FD55,412 lb
X10.50H3,935 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
FD5 is in the 51st percentile; X10.50H is in the 36th · 5,107 models
Length
▲ X10.50H higher · +4 in (+3%)FD5130 in
X10.50H134 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
FD5 is in the 41st percentile; X10.50H is in the 46th · 4,659 models
FD5 (A)X10.50H (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD5 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | FD5 | X10.50H | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD5 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Vendeuvre | Daedong | — |
| Model | Type 66 | 4B243L | — |
| Power Output | 50hp | 49hp | ▲ FD5+1 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 1,800RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ X10.50H+800 RPM · +44% |
| Cylinders | 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 247ci | 149ci | ▲ FD5+98 ci · +66% |
| Bore | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.1in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD5 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD5 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 130in | 134in | ▲ X10.50H+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 68.9in | 63.9in | ▲ FD5+5 in · +8% |
| Height | 63in | 96.2in | ▲ X10.50H+33.2 in · +53% |
| Operating Weight | 5,412lb | 3,935lb | ▲ FD5+1,477 lb · +38% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD5 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD5 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 5.5-20 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Dec-38 | 13.6-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD5 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | 2 | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD5 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers FD5 | McCormick Intl X10.50H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 45th percentile (50 hp)B · 44th percentile (49 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 69th percentile (247 ci)B · 38th percentile (149 ci)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 51st percentile (5,412 lb)B · 36th percentile (3,935 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 41st percentile (130 in)B · 46th percentile (134 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 57th percentile (68.9 in)B · 45th percentile (63.9 in)
A · FD5B · X10.50HMedian Utility Tractor