Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers U
Utility
- power
- 34.1 hp
- displacement
- 283 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Utility
Allis Chalmers U vs Bobcat CT235
Image not recorded
BobcatModel B
Bobcat CT235
Utility
- power
- 34 hp
- displacement
- 97.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers U
vs
BobcatBobcat CT235
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ U higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)U34.1 hp
CT23534 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
U is in the 27th percentile; CT235 is in the 26th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ U higher · +185 ci (+190%)U283 ci
CT23597.6 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
U is in the 83rd percentile; CT235 is in the 22nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ U higher · +1 (+33%)U4
CT2353
Median Utility Tractor4
U is in the 50th percentile; CT235 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ U higher · +1,974 lb (+65%)U5,030 lb
CT2353,056 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
U is in the 48th percentile; CT235 is in the 23rd · 5,107 models
U (A)CT235 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Bobcat CT235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Bobcat | — |
| Model | U | CT235 | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Bobcat CT235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Continental | Daedong | — |
| Model | Continental 4.6L 4-cyl gasoline | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 34.1hp | 34hp | ▲ U+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 1,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ U+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 283ci | 97.6ci | ▲ U+185 ci · +190% |
| Bore | 4.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Bobcat CT235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Bobcat CT235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 119in | 122in | ▲ CT235+3 in · +3% |
| Width | 63.1in | 55.4in | ▲ U+7.7 in · +14% |
| Height | 53.5in | 95.9in | ▲ CT235+42.4 in · +79% |
| Ground Clearance | Not recorded | 9.9in | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,030lb | 3,056lb | ▲ U+1,974 lb · +65% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Bobcat CT235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Bobcat CT235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Middle (Optional), Rear (Live) | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 2,000rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Bobcat CT235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Bobcat CT235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 (MFWD) | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Integral wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Bobcat CT235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Bobcat CT235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers U | Bobcat CT235 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post foldable ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 27th percentile (34.1 hp)B · 26th percentile (34 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 83rd percentile (283 ci)B · 22nd percentile (97.6 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 48th percentile (5,030 lb)B · 23rd percentile (3,056 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 25th percentile (119 in)B · 31st percentile (122 in)
A · UB · CT235Median Utility Tractor