Image not recorded
Allis ChalmersModel A
Allis Chalmers UC
Row Crop
- power
- 30.9 hp
- displacement
- 302 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
Head to head · Row Crop
Allis Chalmers UC vs Yanmar EF312T
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar EF312T
Utility
- power
- 30 hp
- displacement
- 91.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Allis ChalmersAllis Chalmers UC
vs
YanmarYanmar EF312T
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ UC higher · +0.9 hp (+3%)UC30.9 hp
EF312T30 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
UC is in the 3rd percentile; EF312T is in the 2nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ UC higher · +211 ci (+231%)UC302 ci
EF312T91.3 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
UC is in the 33rd percentile; EF312T is in the 1st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ UC higher · +1 (+33%)UC4
EF312T3
Median Row Crop Tractor6
UC is in the 17th percentile; EF312T is in the 2nd · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ EF312T higher · +4 (+100%)UC4
EF312T8
Median Row Crop Tractor16
UC is in the 4th percentile; EF312T is in the 16th · 1,200 models
UC (A)EF312T (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Allis Chalmers UC | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis Chalmers | Yanmar | — |
| Model | UC | EF312T | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Allis Chalmers UC | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Allis-Chalmers | Yanmar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3TNV84 | — |
| Power Output | 30.9hp | 30hp | ▲ UC+0.9 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 1,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ EF312T+1,300 RPM · +108% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ UC+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 302ci | 91.3ci | ▲ UC+211 ci · +231% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 3.3in | ▲ UC+1.1 in · +33% |
| Stroke | 5in | 3.5in | ▲ UC+1.5 in · +43% |
Transmission
| Spec | Allis Chalmers UC | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Non-synchronized gear | Shuttle (synchro-mech) with dry disc clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Allis Chalmers UC | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 145in | 112in | ▲ UC+33 in · +29% |
| Width | 81in | 52in | ▲ UC+29 in · +56% |
| Height | 69.5in | 53.5in | ▲ UC+16 in · +30% |
| Operating Weight | 5,710lb | 2,028lb | ▲ UC+3,682 lb · +182% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Allis Chalmers UC | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Allis Chalmers UC | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Continuous | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Allis Chalmers UC | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,205lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Allis Chalmers UC | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Allis Chalmers UC | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Allis Chalmers UC | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6gal | 1.1gal | ▲ UC+4.9 gal · +445% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Allis Chalmers UC | Yanmar EF312T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open operator station with two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 3rd percentile (30.9 hp)B · 2nd percentile (30 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 33rd percentile (302 ci)B · 1st percentile (91.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 2nd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 4th percentile (4)B · 16th percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 11th percentile (5,710 lb)B · 1st percentile (2,028 lb)
A · UCB · EF312TMedian Row Crop Tractor