Image not recorded
Antonio CarraroModel A
Antonio Carraro SRX 10400
Agricultural
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 181 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Antonio Carraro SRX 10400 vs McCormick Intl X10.90M
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.90M
Utility
- power
- 91.2 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro SRX 10400
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.90M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ SRX 10400 higher · +3.8 hp (+4%)SRX 1040095 hp
X10.90M91.2 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
SRX 10400 is in the 40th percentile; X10.90M is in the 37th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X10.90M higher · +88 ci (+49%)SRX 10400181 ci
X10.90M269 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
SRX 10400 is in the 13th percentile; X10.90M is in the 39th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedSRX 104004
X10.90M4
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
SRX 10400 is in the 31st percentile; X10.90M is in the 31st · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedSRX 1040016
X10.90M16
Median Agricultural Tractor16
SRX 10400 is in the 50th percentile; X10.90M is in the 50th · 972 models
SRX 10400 (A)X10.90M (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Antonio Carraro SRX 10400 | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Antonio Carraro | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | SRX 10400 | X10.90M | — |
| Category | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Antonio Carraro SRX 10400 | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | VM Motori | Perkins | — |
| Model | D754 | D1104D-44T | — |
| Power Output | 95hp | 91.2hp | ▲ SRX 10400+3.8 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ SRX 10400+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 181ci | 269ci | ▲ X10.90M+88 ci · +49% |
| Bore | 3.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Antonio Carraro SRX 10400 | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 16-speed | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Antonio Carraro SRX 10400 | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 138in | 162in | ▲ X10.90M+24 in · +17% |
| Width | Not recorded | 77.8in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 108in | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,718lb | 8,905lb | ▲ X10.90M+4,187 lb · +89% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Antonio Carraro SRX 10400 | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydraulic power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Antonio Carraro SRX 10400 | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Antonio Carraro SRX 10400 | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Antonio Carraro SRX 10400 | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Antonio Carraro SRX 10400 | McCormick Intl X10.90M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS/Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 40th percentile (95 hp)B · 37th percentile (91.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 13th percentile (181 ci)B · 39th percentile (269 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 31st percentile (4)B · 31st percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 10th percentile (4,718 lb)B · 39th percentile (8,905 lb)
A · SRX 10400B · X10.90MMedian Agricultural Tractor