Head to head · Agricultural

Antonio Carraro SRX 8400 vs New Holland New Holland Ford 5635

Image not recorded
Antonio CarraroModel A

Antonio Carraro SRX 8400

Agricultural

power
70 hp
displacement
136 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
16
Full SRX 8400 specs
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro SRX 8400
vs
New HollandNew Holland New Holland Ford 5635

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 497–1,130

Engine Power

▲ SRX 8400 higher · +3.3 hp (+5%)
SRX 840070 hp
New Holland Ford 563566.7 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

SRX 8400 is in the 20th percentile; New Holland Ford 5635 is in the 17th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ New Holland Ford 5635 higher · +102 ci (+75%)
SRX 8400136 ci
New Holland Ford 5635238 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

SRX 8400 is in the 4th percentile; New Holland Ford 5635 is in the 23rd · 1,083 models

Cylinders

▲ New Holland Ford 5635 higher · +1 (+33%)
SRX 84003
New Holland Ford 56354
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

SRX 8400 is in the 8th percentile; New Holland Ford 5635 is in the 31st · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

▲ SRX 8400 higher · +4 (+33%)
SRX 840016
New Holland Ford 563512
Median Agricultural Tractor16

SRX 8400 is in the 50th percentile; New Holland Ford 5635 is in the 33rd · 972 models

SRX 8400 (A)New Holland Ford 5635 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 8400New Holland New Holland Ford 5635Difference
ManufacturerAntonio CarraroNew Holland—
ModelSRX 8400New Holland Ford 5635—
CategoryAgricultural, Orchard/VineyardUtility—

Engine

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 8400New Holland New Holland Ford 5635Difference
ManufacturerVM MotoriIveco—
ModelD7538045.05—
Power Output70hp66.7hp▲ SRX 8400+3.3 hp · +5%
Rated RPM2,300RPM2,500RPM▲ New Holland Ford 5635+200 RPM · +9%
Cylinders34▲ New Holland Ford 5635+1 · +33%
Displacement136ci238ci▲ New Holland Ford 5635+102 ci · +75%
Bore3.7in4.1in▲ New Holland Ford 5635+0.4 in · +11%
Stroke4.2in4.5in▲ New Holland Ford 5635+0.3 in · +7%

Transmission

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 8400New Holland New Holland Ford 5635Difference
TypeManualPartially synchronized—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 8400New Holland New Holland Ford 5635Difference
Length134inNot recorded—
Width41.7in72.6in▲ New Holland Ford 5635+30.9 in · +74%
Height89.8inNot recorded—
Operating Weight4,486lb7,540lb▲ New Holland Ford 5635+3,054 lb · +68%

Hydraulics

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 8400New Holland New Holland Ford 5635Difference
System TypeNot recordedOpen center—
Steering TypeHydraulic PowerPower—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 8400New Holland New Holland Ford 5635Difference
Hitch CategoryII/III—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 8400New Holland New Holland Ford 5635Difference
Chassis Type4x4 articulated 4WD4x2 2WD—
Drive Type4WD2WD—
Steering TypeHydraulic PowerPower—

Electrical

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 8400New Holland New Holland Ford 5635Difference
Starter TypeElectric12 volt—

Capacities

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 8400New Holland New Holland Ford 5635Difference
CoolantNot recorded3.1gal—

Operator Station

SpecAntonio Carraro SRX 8400New Holland New Holland Ford 5635Difference
TypeROPS/CabROPS and Cab available—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 20th percentile (70 hp)B · 17th percentile (66.7 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 4th percentile (136 ci)B · 23rd percentile (238 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 8th percentile (3)B · 31st percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 33rd percentile (12)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 9th percentile (4,486 lb)B · 28th percentile (7,540 lb)
A · SRX 8400B · New Holland Ford 5635Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageAntonio Carraro SRX 8400Full spec pageNew Holland New Holland Ford 5635