Antonio CarraroModel A
Antonio Carraro TGF 10400
Agricultural
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 181 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 vs CaseIH Farmall 95U
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 95U
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro TGF 10400
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 95U
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedTGF 1040095 hp
Farmall 95U95 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
TGF 10400 is in the 40th percentile; Farmall 95U is in the 40th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 95U higher · +93 ci (+51%)TGF 10400181 ci
Farmall 95U274 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
TGF 10400 is in the 13th percentile; Farmall 95U is in the 41st · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedTGF 104004
Farmall 95U4
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
TGF 10400 is in the 31st percentile; Farmall 95U is in the 31st · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ Farmall 95U higher · +1,587 lb (+30%)TGF 104005,247 lb
Farmall 95U6,834 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
TGF 10400 is in the 14th percentile; Farmall 95U is in the 24th · 971 models
TGF 10400 (A)Farmall 95U (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Antonio Carraro | CaseIH | — |
| Model | TGF 10400 | Farmall 95U | — |
| Category | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | VM Motori | FPT | — |
| Model | D754 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 95hp | 95hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ TGF 10400+300 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 181ci | 274ci | ▲ Farmall 95U+93 ci · +51% |
| Bore | 3.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 16-speed | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 133in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 101in | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,247lb | 6,834lb | ▲ Farmall 95U+1,587 lb · +30% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Stage 3A | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 40th percentile (95 hp)B · 40th percentile (95 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 13th percentile (181 ci)B · 41st percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 31st percentile (4)B · 31st percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 14th percentile (5,247 lb)B · 24th percentile (6,834 lb)
A · TGF 10400B · Farmall 95UMedian Agricultural Tractor