Head to head · Utility

Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S vs Lindner Geotrac 73

Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S Tractor
Antonio CarraroModel A

Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S

Utility

power
71 hp
displacement
203 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
16
Full TGF 7800S specs
Image not recorded
LindnerModel B

Lindner Geotrac 73

Utility

power
74 hp
displacement
201 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
16
Full Geotrac 73 specs
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro TGF 7800S
vs
LindnerLindner Geotrac 73

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,933–5,720

Engine Power

▲ Geotrac 73 higher · +3 hp (+4%)
TGF 7800S71 hp
Geotrac 7374 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

TGF 7800S is in the 64th percentile; Geotrac 73 is in the 66th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ TGF 7800S higher · +2 ci (<1%)
TGF 7800S203 ci
Geotrac 73201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

TGF 7800S is in the 55th percentile; Geotrac 73 is in the 55th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ TGF 7800S higher · +1 (+33%)
TGF 7800S4
Geotrac 733
Median Utility Tractor4

TGF 7800S is in the 50th percentile; Geotrac 73 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
TGF 7800S16
Geotrac 7316
Median Utility Tractor12

TGF 7800S is in the 73rd percentile; Geotrac 73 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models

TGF 7800S (A)Geotrac 73 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SLindner Geotrac 73Difference
ManufacturerAntonio CarraroLindner—
ModelTGF 7800SGeotrac 73—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SLindner Geotrac 73Difference
ManufacturerYanmarPerkins—
ModelNot recorded1103—
Power Output71hp74hp▲ Geotrac 73+3 hp · +4%
Rated RPM2,500RPM2,200RPM▲ TGF 7800S+300 RPM · +14%
Cylinders43▲ TGF 7800S+1 · +33%
Displacement203ci201ci▲ TGF 7800S+2 ci · <1%
Bore3.9in4.1in▲ Geotrac 73+0.2 in · +5%
Stroke4.3in5in▲ Geotrac 73+0.7 in · +16%

Transmission

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SLindner Geotrac 73Difference
TypeManualManualSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SLindner Geotrac 73Difference
Length136in149in▲ Geotrac 73+13 in · +10%
Width52.4in77.6in▲ Geotrac 73+25.2 in · +48%
HeightNot recorded96.5in—
Operating Weight5,093lb6,505lb▲ Geotrac 73+1,412 lb · +28%

Hydraulics

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SLindner Geotrac 73Difference
Steering TypeHydraulic power steeringNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SLindner Geotrac 73Difference
Hitch Type3-pointNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryII/ICategory 3—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SLindner Geotrac 73Difference
Chassis Type4x4 articulated 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypeHydraulic power steeringNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SLindner Geotrac 73Difference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Emissions

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SLindner Geotrac 73Difference
StandardStage 3ANot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SLindner Geotrac 73Difference
TypeROPSNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 66th percentile (74 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 55th percentile (203 ci)B · 55th percentile (201 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 49th percentile (5,093 lb)B · 62nd percentile (6,505 lb)
A · TGF 7800SB · Geotrac 73Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SFull spec pageLindner Geotrac 73