Antonio CarraroModel A
Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S
Utility
- power
- 71 hp
- displacement
- 203 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S vs McCormick Intl CX70
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl CX70
Utility
- power
- 73 hp
- displacement
- 256 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro TGF 7800S
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CX70
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CX70 higher · +2 hp (+3%)TGF 7800S71 hp
CX7073 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
TGF 7800S is in the 64th percentile; CX70 is in the 66th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CX70 higher · +53 ci (+26%)TGF 7800S203 ci
CX70256 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
TGF 7800S is in the 55th percentile; CX70 is in the 73rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedTGF 7800S4
CX704
Median Utility Tractor4
TGF 7800S is in the 50th percentile; CX70 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedTGF 7800S16
CX7016
Median Utility Tractor12
TGF 7800S is in the 73rd percentile; CX70 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
TGF 7800S (A)CX70 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S | McCormick Intl CX70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Antonio Carraro | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | TGF 7800S | CX70 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S | McCormick Intl CX70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Yanmar | Perkins | — |
| Power Output | 71hp | 73hp | ▲ CX70+2 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ TGF 7800S+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 203ci | 256ci | ▲ CX70+53 ci · +26% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.1in | ▲ CX70+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 5in | ▲ CX70+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S | McCormick Intl CX70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Sync shuttle / Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S | McCormick Intl CX70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 136in | 166in | ▲ CX70+30 in · +22% |
| Width | 52.4in | 77.3in | ▲ CX70+24.9 in · +48% |
| Operating Weight | 5,093lb | 7,242lb | ▲ CX70+2,149 lb · +42% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S | McCormick Intl CX70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic power steering | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S | McCormick Intl CX70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3-point | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S | McCormick Intl CX70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic power steering | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S | McCormick Intl CX70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S | McCormick Intl CX70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Stage 3A | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S | McCormick Intl CX70 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 66th percentile (73 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 55th percentile (203 ci)B · 73rd percentile (256 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 49th percentile (5,093 lb)B · 69th percentile (7,242 lb)
A · TGF 7800SB · CX70Median Utility Tractor