Head to head · Utility

Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S vs McCormick Intl CX75

Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S Tractor
Antonio CarraroModel A

Antonio Carraro TGF 7800S

Utility

power
71 hp
displacement
203 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
16
Full TGF 7800S specs
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B

McCormick Intl CX75

Utility

power
73 hp
displacement
269 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
24
Full CX75 specs
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro TGF 7800S
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CX75

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 4,659–5,720

Engine Power

▲ CX75 higher · +2 hp (+3%)
TGF 7800S71 hp
CX7573 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

TGF 7800S is in the 64th percentile; CX75 is in the 66th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ CX75 higher · +66 ci (+33%)
TGF 7800S203 ci
CX75269 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

TGF 7800S is in the 55th percentile; CX75 is in the 77th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
TGF 7800S4
CX754
Median Utility Tractor4

TGF 7800S is in the 50th percentile; CX75 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ CX75 higher · +8 (+50%)
TGF 7800S16
CX7524
Median Utility Tractor12

TGF 7800S is in the 73rd percentile; CX75 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models

TGF 7800S (A)CX75 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SMcCormick Intl CX75Difference
ManufacturerAntonio CarraroMcCormick Intl—
ModelTGF 7800SCX75—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SMcCormick Intl CX75Difference
ManufacturerYanmarPerkins—
Power Output71hp73hp▲ CX75+2 hp · +3%
Rated RPM2,500RPM2,200RPM▲ TGF 7800S+300 RPM · +14%
Cylinders44Same
Displacement203ci269ci▲ CX75+66 ci · +33%
Bore3.9in4.1in▲ CX75+0.2 in · +5%
Stroke4.3in5in▲ CX75+0.7 in · +16%

Transmission

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SMcCormick Intl CX75Difference
TypeManualPartial power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SMcCormick Intl CX75Difference
Length136in166in▲ CX75+30 in · +22%
Width52.4inNot recorded—
HeightNot recorded100in—
Operating Weight5,093lb8,312lb▲ CX75+3,219 lb · +63%

Hydraulics

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SMcCormick Intl CX75Difference
System TypeNot recordedOpen center—
Steering TypeHydraulic power steeringHydrostatic power—

Hitch & Towing

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SMcCormick Intl CX75Difference
Hitch Type3-pointNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryII/INot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SMcCormick Intl CX75Difference
Chassis Type4x4 articulated 4WD4x2 2WD—
Drive Type4WD2WD—
Steering TypeHydraulic power steeringHydrostatic power—

Electrical

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SMcCormick Intl CX75Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SMcCormick Intl CX75Difference
StandardStage 3ANot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SMcCormick Intl CX75Difference
TypeROPSNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 64th percentile (71 hp)B · 66th percentile (73 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 55th percentile (203 ci)B · 77th percentile (269 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 92nd percentile (24)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 49th percentile (5,093 lb)B · 78th percentile (8,312 lb)
A · TGF 7800SB · CX75Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageAntonio Carraro TGF 7800SFull spec pageMcCormick Intl CX75