Image not recorded
Antonio CarraroModel A
Antonio Carraro Tigre 4000F
Utility
- power
- 38 hp
- displacement
- 100 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Antonio Carraro Tigre 4000F vs Ford-New Holland 3230
Image not recorded
Ford-New HollandModel B
Ford-New Holland 3230
Utility
- power
- 37 hp
- displacement
- 192 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro Tigre 4000F
vs
Ford-New HollandFord-New Holland 3230
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Tigre 4000F higher · +1 hp (+3%)Tigre 4000F38 hp
323037 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Tigre 4000F is in the 31st percentile; 3230 is in the 30th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 3230 higher · +92 ci (+92%)Tigre 4000F100 ci
3230192 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Tigre 4000F is in the 22nd percentile; 3230 is in the 51st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedTigre 4000F3
32303
Median Utility Tractor4
Tigre 4000F is in the 23rd percentile; 3230 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedTigre 4000F8
32308
Median Utility Tractor12
Tigre 4000F is in the 23rd percentile; 3230 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
Tigre 4000F (A)3230 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Antonio Carraro Tigre 4000F | Ford-New Holland 3230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Antonio Carraro | Ford-New Holland | — |
| Model | Tigre 4000F | 3230 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Antonio Carraro Tigre 4000F | Ford-New Holland 3230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Yanmar | Ford | — |
| Model | 3TNV88 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 38hp | 37hp | ▲ Tigre 4000F+1 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ Tigre 4000F+1,000 RPM · +50% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 100ci | 192ci | ▲ 3230+92 ci · +92% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 4.4in | ▲ 3230+0.9 in · +26% |
| Stroke | 3.5in | 4.2in | ▲ 3230+0.7 in · +20% |
Transmission
| Spec | Antonio Carraro Tigre 4000F | Ford-New Holland 3230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Antonio Carraro Tigre 4000F | Ford-New Holland 3230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 116in | 137in | ▲ 3230+21 in · +18% |
| Width | 50.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 75.2in | 90.9in | ▲ 3230+15.7 in · +21% |
| Operating Weight | 2,756lb | 5,374lb | ▲ 3230+2,618 lb · +95% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Antonio Carraro Tigre 4000F | Ford-New Holland 3230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Antonio Carraro Tigre 4000F | Ford-New Holland 3230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Antonio Carraro Tigre 4000F | Ford-New Holland 3230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Antonio Carraro Tigre 4000F | Ford-New Holland 3230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Antonio Carraro Tigre 4000F | Ford-New Holland 3230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Antonio Carraro Tigre 4000F | Ford-New Holland 3230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 31st percentile (38 hp)B · 30th percentile (37 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 22nd percentile (100 ci)B · 51st percentile (192 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 20th percentile (2,756 lb)B · 50th percentile (5,374 lb)
A · Tigre 4000FB · 3230Median Utility Tractor