Image not recorded
Antonio CarraroModel A
Antonio Carraro TRX 10400
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 181 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Antonio Carraro TRX 10400 vs CaseIH Farmall 95U
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 95U
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Antonio CarraroAntonio Carraro TRX 10400
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 95U
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedTRX 1040095 hp
Farmall 95U95 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
TRX 10400 is in the 81st percentile; Farmall 95U is in the 81st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 95U higher · +93 ci (+51%)TRX 10400181 ci
Farmall 95U274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
TRX 10400 is in the 49th percentile; Farmall 95U is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedTRX 104004
Farmall 95U4
Median Utility Tractor4
TRX 10400 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 95U is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ Farmall 95U higher · +2,006 lb (+42%)TRX 104004,828 lb
Farmall 95U6,834 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
TRX 10400 is in the 46th percentile; Farmall 95U is in the 65th · 5,107 models
TRX 10400 (A)Farmall 95U (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Antonio Carraro | CaseIH | — |
| Model | TRX 10400 | Farmall 95U | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | VM Motori | FPT | — |
| Model | D754 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 95hp | 95hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ TRX 10400+300 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 181ci | 274ci | ▲ Farmall 95U+93 ci · +51% |
| Bore | 3.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 134in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 54.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 101in | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,828lb | 6,834lb | ▲ Farmall 95U+2,006 lb · +42% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Antonio Carraro TRX 10400 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 81st percentile (95 hp)B · 81st percentile (95 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 49th percentile (181 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 46th percentile (4,828 lb)B · 65th percentile (6,834 lb)
A · TRX 10400B · Farmall 95UMedian Utility Tractor