Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs CaseIH Farmall DX25E
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall DX25E
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 61.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ApolloApollo 254
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall DX25E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied25425 hp
Farmall DX25E25 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; Farmall DX25E is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +32.2 ci (+53%)25493.5 ci
Farmall DX25E61.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; Farmall DX25E is in the 7th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2543
Farmall DX25E3
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall DX25E is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
254 (A)Farmall DX25E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 254 | Farmall DX25E | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Shibaura | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | ISM-S773 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ Farmall DX25E+600 RPM · +25% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 61.3ci | ▲ 254+32.2 ci · +53% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 2.8in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 56.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 91.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 1,323lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | CaseIH Farmall DX25E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 7th percentile (61.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
A · 254B · Farmall DX25EMedian Utility Tractor