Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs Daedong CK25 HST
DaedongModel B
Daedong CK25 HST
Sub-Compact
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 79.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ApolloApollo 254
vs
DaedongDaedong CK25 HST
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied25425 hp
CK25 HST25 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; CK25 HST is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +14.2 ci (+18%)25493.5 ci
CK25 HST79.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; CK25 HST is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2543
CK25 HST3
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; CK25 HST is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Length
▲ 254 higher · +28 in (+22%)254154 in
CK25 HST126 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
254 is in the 70th percentile; CK25 HST is in the 36th · 4,659 models
254 (A)CK25 HST (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Daedong CK25 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Daedong | — |
| Model | 254 | CK25 HST | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Daedong CK25 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Daedong | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | TD1300LXE | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ CK25 HST+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 79.3ci | ▲ 254+14.2 ci · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Daedong CK25 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic Drive | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Daedong CK25 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | 126in | ▲ 254+28 in · +22% |
| Width | 56.7in | 51.6in | ▲ 254+5.1 in · +10% |
| Height | 91.3in | 93.6in | ▲ CK25 HST+2.3 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 3,175lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Daedong CK25 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Daedong CK25 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | 14x6 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | 24x9.5 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Daedong CK25 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,764lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Daedong CK25 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Daedong CK25 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Daedong CK25 HST | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 12th percentile (79.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Length
median 137 inA · 70th percentile (154 in)B · 36th percentile (126 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 31st percentile (56.7 in)B · 20th percentile (51.6 in)
A · 254B · CK25 HSTMedian Utility Tractor