Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs Ford 9N
ApolloApollo 254
vs
FordFord 9N
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 9N higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)25425 hp
9N25.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; 9N is in the 17th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9N higher · +26.5 ci (+28%)25493.5 ci
9N120 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; 9N is in the 28th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 9N higher · +1 (+33%)2543
9N4
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; 9N is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 254 higher · +6 (+200%)2549
9N3
Median Utility Tractor12
254 is in the 35th percentile; 9N is in the 3rd · 4,941 models
254 (A)9N (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Ford | — |
| Model | 254 | 9N | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Ford | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | Ford | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25.1hp | ▲ 9N+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,001RPM | ▲ 254+399 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 9N+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 120ci | ▲ 9N+26.5 ci · +28% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.2in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.8in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | 115in | ▲ 254+39 in · +34% |
| Width | 56.7in | 64in | ▲ 9N+7.3 in · +13% |
| Height | 91.3in | 52in | ▲ 254+39.3 in · +76% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 3,576lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 558rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | 4.00x19 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | 10.00x28 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 798lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential mechanical shoe | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Ford 9N | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 17th percentile (25.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 28th percentile (120 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 3rd percentile (3)
Length
median 137 inA · 70th percentile (154 in)B · 20th percentile (115 in)
A · 254B · 9NMedian Utility Tractor