Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs Hinomoto E262
HinomotoModel B
Hinomoto E262
Sub-Compact
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 84.8 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ApolloApollo 254
vs
HinomotoHinomoto E262
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ E262 higher · +1 hp (+4%)25425 hp
E26226 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; E262 is in the 18th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +8.7 ci (+10%)25493.5 ci
E26284.8 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; E262 is in the 14th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2543
E2623
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; E262 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
254 (A)E262 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Hinomoto E262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Hinomoto | — |
| Model | 254 | E262 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Hinomoto E262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Toyosha | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | 3S139 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 26hp | ▲ E262+1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 84.8ci | ▲ 254+8.7 ci · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Hinomoto E262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Hinomoto E262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 56.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 91.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 2,200lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Hinomoto E262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Hinomoto E262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Hinomoto E262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Hinomoto E262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Hinomoto E262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Hinomoto E262 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 18th percentile (26 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 14th percentile (84.8 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
A · 254B · E262Median Utility Tractor