Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs Iseki AT260
Image not recorded
IsekiModel B
Iseki AT260
Utility
- power
- 25.6 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
ApolloApollo 254
vs
IsekiIseki AT260
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ AT260 higher · +0.6 hp (+2%)25425 hp
AT26025.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; AT260 is in the 17th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ AT260 higher · +7.5 ci (+8%)25493.5 ci
AT260101 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; AT260 is in the 23rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2543
AT2603
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; AT260 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ AT260 higher · +7 (+78%)2549
AT26016
Median Utility Tractor12
254 is in the 35th percentile; AT260 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
254 (A)AT260 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Iseki AT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Iseki | — |
| Model | 254 | AT260 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Iseki AT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Iseki | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | E3CG | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25.6hp | ▲ AT260+0.6 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ AT260+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 101ci | ▲ AT260+7.5 ci · +8% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.6in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Iseki AT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Iseki AT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | 119in | ▲ 254+35 in · +29% |
| Width | 56.7in | 54in | ▲ 254+2.7 in · +5% |
| Height | 91.3in | 78in | ▲ 254+13.3 in · +17% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 2,998lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Iseki AT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Iseki AT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | 11.2-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Iseki AT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Iseki AT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Iseki AT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Iseki AT260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 17th percentile (25.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 23rd percentile (101 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Length
median 137 inA · 70th percentile (154 in)B · 25th percentile (119 in)
A · 254B · AT260Median Utility Tractor