Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs Massey Ferguson 1526
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 1526
Utility
- power
- 24.8 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ApolloApollo 254
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1526
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 254 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)25425 hp
152624.8 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; 1526 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +2.1 ci (+2%)25493.5 ci
152691.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; 1526 is in the 18th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2543
15263
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; 1526 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Length
▲ 254 higher · +43 in (+39%)254154 in
1526111 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
254 is in the 70th percentile; 1526 is in the 17th · 4,659 models
254 (A)1526 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 254 | 1526 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Iseki | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | E3CF-VB22 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 24.8hp | ▲ 254+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 1526+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 91.4ci | ▲ 254+2.1 ci · +2% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.3in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | 111in | ▲ 254+43 in · +39% |
| Width | 56.7in | 49.2in | ▲ 254+7.5 in · +15% |
| Height | 91.3in | 95.5in | ▲ 1526+4.2 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 1,873lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 2,000rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,323lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Massey Ferguson 1526 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Two-post foldable ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.8 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Length
median 137 inA · 70th percentile (154 in)B · 17th percentile (111 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 31st percentile (56.7 in)B · 16th percentile (49.2 in)
A · 254B · 1526Median Utility Tractor