Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs Mitsubishi D2650
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi D2650
Utility
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 15
ApolloApollo 254
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi D2650
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ D2650 higher · +1 hp (+4%)25425 hp
D265026 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; D2650 is in the 18th · 5,383 models
Cylinders
▲ D2650 higher · +1 (+33%)2543
D26504
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; D2650 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ D2650 higher · +6 (+67%)2549
D265015
Median Utility Tractor12
254 is in the 35th percentile; D2650 is in the 64th · 4,941 models
254 (A)D2650 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi D2650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 254 | D2650 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi D2650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 26hp | ▲ D2650+1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ D2650+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi D2650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi D2650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 56.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 91.3in | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi D2650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi D2650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi D2650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi D2650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi D2650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi D2650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 18th percentile (26 hp)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 64th percentile (15)
A · 254B · D2650Median Utility Tractor