Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs Mitsubishi GSK250
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi GSK250
Crawler
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
ApolloApollo 254
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GSK250
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 254 higher · +0.3 hp (+1%)25425 hp
GSK25024.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; GSK250 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +2.1 ci (+2%)25493.5 ci
GSK25091.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; GSK250 is in the 18th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2543
GSK2503
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; GSK250 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ GSK250 higher · +3 (+33%)2549
GSK25012
Median Utility Tractor12
254 is in the 35th percentile; GSK250 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
254 (A)GSK250 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 254 | GSK250 | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Isuzu | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | E3CD | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 24.7hp | ▲ 254+0.3 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ GSK250+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 91.4ci | ▲ 254+2.1 ci · +2% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.4in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 56.7in | 56.3in | ▲ 254+0.4 in · <1% |
| Height | 91.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 2,811lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | JIS0 | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Half-track | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi GSK250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 50th percentile (12)
Width
median 66 inA · 31st percentile (56.7 in)B · 31st percentile (56.3 in)
A · 254B · GSK250Median Utility Tractor