Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs Mitsubishi R2500
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi R2500
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 76 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 6
ApolloApollo 254
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi R2500
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied25425 hp
R250025 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; R2500 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +17.5 ci (+23%)25493.5 ci
R250076 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; R2500 is in the 11th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 254 higher · +1 (+50%)2543
R25002
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; R2500 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 254 higher · +3 (+50%)2549
R25006
Median Utility Tractor12
254 is in the 35th percentile; R2500 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
254 (A)R2500 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi R2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 254 | R2500 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi R2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | SDT130 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ 254+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 76ci | ▲ 254+17.5 ci · +23% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.5in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi R2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi R2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 56.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 91.3in | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi R2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi R2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi R2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi R2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi R2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Mitsubishi R2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 11th percentile (76 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 11th percentile (6)
A · 254B · R2500Median Utility Tractor