Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs New Holland Boomer TZ25DA
New HollandModel B
New Holland Boomer TZ25DA
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 61.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ApolloApollo 254
vs
New HollandNew Holland Boomer TZ25DA
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied25425 hp
Boomer TZ25DA25 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; Boomer TZ25DA is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +32.2 ci (+53%)25493.5 ci
Boomer TZ25DA61.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; Boomer TZ25DA is in the 7th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2543
Boomer TZ25DA3
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; Boomer TZ25DA is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Length
▲ 254 higher · +57.7 in (+60%)254154 in
Boomer TZ25DA96.3 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
254 is in the 70th percentile; Boomer TZ25DA is in the 7th · 4,659 models
254 (A)Boomer TZ25DA (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | New Holland Boomer TZ25DA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | New Holland | — |
| Model | 254 | Boomer TZ25DA | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | New Holland Boomer TZ25DA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Shibaura | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | S773 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ Boomer TZ25DA+600 RPM · +25% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 61.3ci | ▲ 254+32.2 ci · +53% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 2.8in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | New Holland Boomer TZ25DA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | New Holland Boomer TZ25DA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | 96.3in | ▲ 254+57.7 in · +60% |
| Width | 56.7in | 45.9in | ▲ 254+10.8 in · +24% |
| Height | 91.3in | 89.8in | ▲ 254+1.5 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 1,320lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | New Holland Boomer TZ25DA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Apollo 254 | New Holland Boomer TZ25DA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Standard Mid and Independent Rear | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 2,200rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | New Holland Boomer TZ25DA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | New Holland Boomer TZ25DA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 699lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | New Holland Boomer TZ25DA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | New Holland Boomer TZ25DA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | New Holland Boomer TZ25DA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 7th percentile (61.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Length
median 137 inA · 70th percentile (154 in)B · 7th percentile (96.3 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 31st percentile (56.7 in)B · 11th percentile (45.9 in)
A · 254B · Boomer TZ25DAMedian Utility Tractor