Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs Satoh Bison S650G
Image not recorded
SatohModel B
Satoh Bison S650G
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 60.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 6
ApolloApollo 254
vs
SatohSatoh Bison S650G
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied25425 hp
Bison S650G25 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; Bison S650G is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +33.3 ci (+55%)25493.5 ci
Bison S650G60.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; Bison S650G is in the 6th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Bison S650G higher · +1 (+33%)2543
Bison S650G4
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; Bison S650G is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 254 higher · +3 (+50%)2549
Bison S650G6
Median Utility Tractor12
254 is in the 35th percentile; Bison S650G is in the 11th · 4,941 models
254 (A)Bison S650G (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Satoh Bison S650G | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Satoh | — |
| Model | 254 | Bison S650G | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Satoh Bison S650G | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Mazda | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | PB100 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ Bison S650G+400 RPM · +17% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ Bison S650G+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 60.2ci | ▲ 254+33.3 ci · +55% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 2.7in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 2.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Satoh Bison S650G | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Unsynchronized gear with dry disc clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Satoh Bison S650G | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | 94.9in | ▲ 254+59.1 in · +62% |
| Width | 56.7in | 53in | ▲ 254+3.7 in · +7% |
| Height | 91.3in | 54.7in | ▲ 254+36.6 in · +67% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 2,105lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Satoh Bison S650G | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Mechanical | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Satoh Bison S650G | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Satoh Bison S650G | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Satoh Bison S650G | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Satoh Bison S650G | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Mechanical | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential mechanical internal expanding shoe | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Satoh Bison S650G | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Satoh Bison S650G | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Satoh Bison S650G | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open with two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 6th percentile (60.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 11th percentile (6)
Length
median 137 inA · 70th percentile (154 in)B · 6th percentile (94.9 in)
A · 254B · Bison S650GMedian Utility Tractor