Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs Shibaura S325
Image not recorded
ShibauraModel B
Shibaura S325
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ApolloApollo 254
vs
ShibauraShibaura S325
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied25425 hp
S32525 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; S325 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +12.3 ci (+15%)25493.5 ci
S32581.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; S325 is in the 13th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2543
S3253
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; S325 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Length
▲ 254 higher · +42 in (+38%)254154 in
S325112 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
254 is in the 70th percentile; S325 is in the 18th · 4,659 models
254 (A)S325 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Shibaura S325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Shibaura | — |
| Model | 254 | S325 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Shibaura S325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Shibaura | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | J843 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 81.2ci | ▲ 254+12.3 ci · +15% |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Shibaura S325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Shibaura S325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | 112in | ▲ 254+42 in · +38% |
| Width | 56.7in | 57.7in | ▲ S325+1 in · +2% |
| Height | 91.3in | 50.2in | ▲ 254+41.1 in · +82% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 2,235lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Shibaura S325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Shibaura S325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Shibaura S325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Shibaura S325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Shibaura S325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Shibaura S325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Length
median 137 inA · 70th percentile (154 in)B · 18th percentile (112 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 31st percentile (56.7 in)B · 33rd percentile (57.7 in)
A · 254B · S325Median Utility Tractor