Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs Yanmar F265
YanmarModel B
Yanmar F265
Utility
- power
- 25.6 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 18
ApolloApollo 254
vs
YanmarYanmar F265
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ F265 higher · +0.6 hp (+2%)25425 hp
F26525.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; F265 is in the 17th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +4.2 ci (+5%)25493.5 ci
F26589.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; F265 is in the 15th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2543
F2653
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; F265 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ F265 higher · +9 (+100%)2549
F26518
Median Utility Tractor12
254 is in the 35th percentile; F265 is in the 83rd · 4,941 models
254 (A)F265 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 254 | F265 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Yanmar | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | 3TNB84 | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25.6hp | ▲ F265+0.6 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ F265+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 89.3ci | ▲ 254+4.2 ci · +5% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear / Creeper | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | 113in | ▲ 254+41 in · +36% |
| Width | 56.7in | 55.5in | ▲ 254+1.2 in · +2% |
| Height | 91.3in | 59.8in | ▲ 254+31.5 in · +53% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 2,249lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar F265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 17th percentile (25.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 83rd percentile (18)
Length
median 137 inA · 70th percentile (154 in)B · 18th percentile (113 in)
A · 254B · F265Median Utility Tractor