Head to head · Utility
Apollo 254 vs Yanmar FX26D
YanmarModel B
Yanmar FX26D
Sub-Compact
- power
- 26 hp
- displacement
- 90.9 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ApolloApollo 254
vs
YanmarYanmar FX26D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ FX26D higher · +1 hp (+4%)25425 hp
FX26D26 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
254 is in the 16th percentile; FX26D is in the 18th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 254 higher · +2.6 ci (+3%)25493.5 ci
FX26D90.9 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
254 is in the 21st percentile; FX26D is in the 17th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ FX26D higher · +1 (+33%)2543
FX26D4
Median Utility Tractor4
254 is in the 23rd percentile; FX26D is in the 50th · 5,720 models
254 (A)FX26D (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar FX26D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 254 | FX26D | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar FX26D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Yanmar | — |
| Model | CF3B25T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 26hp | ▲ FX26D+1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ FX26D+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 90.9ci | ▲ 254+2.6 ci · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar FX26D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar FX26D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 154in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 56.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 91.3in | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar FX26D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar FX26D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.00x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 9.5x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar FX26D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar FX26D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar FX26D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 254 | Yanmar FX26D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 18th percentile (26 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 17th percentile (90.9 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
A · 254B · FX26DMedian Utility Tractor