Head to head · Utility
Apollo 354 vs Bobcat CT2535
Image not recorded
BobcatModel B
Bobcat CT2535
Sub-Compact
- power
- 34.9 hp
- displacement
- 111 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ApolloApollo 354
vs
BobcatBobcat CT2535
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 354 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)35435 hp
CT253534.9 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
354 is in the 28th percentile; CT2535 is in the 27th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CT2535 higher · +17.5 ci (+19%)35493.5 ci
CT2535111 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
354 is in the 21st percentile; CT2535 is in the 26th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied3543
CT25353
Median Utility Tractor4
354 is in the 23rd percentile; CT2535 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Length
▲ 354 higher · +37 in (+31%)354158 in
CT2535121 in
Median Utility Tractor137 in
354 is in the 74th percentile; CT2535 is in the 28th · 4,659 models
354 (A)CT2535 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Bobcat CT2535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Bobcat | — |
| Model | 354 | CT2535 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Bobcat CT2535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Daedong | — |
| Model | CF3B28T | 3F-TM | — |
| Power Output | 35hp | 34.9hp | ▲ 354+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 111ci | ▲ CT2535+17.5 ci · +19% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Bobcat CT2535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Shuttle | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Bobcat CT2535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 158in | 121in | ▲ 354+37 in · +31% |
| Width | 56.7in | 56in | ▲ 354+0.7 in · +1% |
| Height | 90.6in | 91.7in | ▲ CT2535+1.1 in · +1% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 3,397lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Bobcat CT2535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Bobcat CT2535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Rear: Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Bobcat CT2535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four Wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Bobcat CT2535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Bobcat CT2535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 28th percentile (35 hp)B · 27th percentile (34.9 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 26th percentile (111 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Length
median 137 inA · 74th percentile (158 in)B · 28th percentile (121 in)
Width
median 66 inA · 31st percentile (56.7 in)B · 30th percentile (56 in)
A · 354B · CT2535Median Utility Tractor