Head to head · Utility
Apollo 354 vs Farmall F-267
Image not recorded
FarmallModel B
Farmall F-267
Row Crop
- power
- 35 hp
- displacement
- 136 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 6
ApolloApollo 354
vs
FarmallFarmall F-267
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied35435 hp
F-26735 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
354 is in the 28th percentile; F-267 is in the 28th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ F-267 higher · +42.5 ci (+45%)35493.5 ci
F-267136 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
354 is in the 21st percentile; F-267 is in the 35th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ F-267 higher · +1 (+33%)3543
F-2674
Median Utility Tractor4
354 is in the 23rd percentile; F-267 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 354 higher · +2 (+33%)3548
F-2676
Median Utility Tractor12
354 is in the 23rd percentile; F-267 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
354 (A)F-267 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Farmall F-267 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Farmall | — |
| Model | 354 | F-267 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Farmall F-267 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | International Harvester | — |
| Model | CF3B28T | FD-136 | — |
| Power Output | 35hp | 35hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 354+600 RPM · +30% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ F-267+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 136ci | ▲ F-267+42.5 ci · +45% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Farmall F-267 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Shuttle | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Farmall F-267 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 158in | 130in | ▲ 354+28 in · +22% |
| Width | 56.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 90.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 4,134lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Farmall F-267 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Farmall F-267 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Farmall F-267 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four Wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Farmall F-267 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Farmall F-267 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 28th percentile (35 hp)B · 28th percentile (35 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 35th percentile (136 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 11th percentile (6)
Length
median 137 inA · 74th percentile (158 in)B · 41st percentile (130 in)
A · 354B · F-267Median Utility Tractor