Head to head · Utility
Apollo 354 vs Fendt F231GT
FendtModel B
Fendt F231GT
Utility
- power
- 35 hp
- displacement
- 156 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
ApolloApollo 354
vs
FendtFendt F231GT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied35435 hp
F231GT35 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
354 is in the 28th percentile; F231GT is in the 28th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ F231GT higher · +62.5 ci (+67%)35493.5 ci
F231GT156 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
354 is in the 21st percentile; F231GT is in the 42nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied3543
F231GT3
Median Utility Tractor4
354 is in the 23rd percentile; F231GT is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ F231GT higher · +8 (+100%)3548
F231GT16
Median Utility Tractor12
354 is in the 23rd percentile; F231GT is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
354 (A)F231GT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Fendt F231GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Fendt | — |
| Model | 354 | F231GT | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Fendt F231GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | MWM | — |
| Model | CF3B28T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 35hp | 35hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,050RPM | ▲ 354+550 RPM · +27% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 93.5ci | 156ci | ▲ F231GT+62.5 ci · +67% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.7in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Fendt F231GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Shuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Fendt F231GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 158in | 169in | ▲ F231GT+11 in · +7% |
| Width | 56.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 90.6in | 94.9in | ▲ F231GT+4.3 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 4,520lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Fendt F231GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Fendt F231GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 5.50-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 9.5-32 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Fendt F231GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Fendt F231GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four Wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Fendt F231GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 354 | Fendt F231GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 28th percentile (35 hp)B · 28th percentile (35 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 21st percentile (93.5 ci)B · 42nd percentile (156 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Length
median 137 inA · 74th percentile (158 in)B · 85th percentile (169 in)
A · 354B · F231GTMedian Utility Tractor