Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 454 vs Farmall Super M
FarmallModel B
Farmall Super M
Row Crop
- power
- 44.3 hp
- displacement
- 264 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 5
ApolloApollo 454
vs
FarmallFarmall Super M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 454 higher · +0.7 hp (+2%)45445 hp
Super M44.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
454 is in the 39th percentile; Super M is in the 38th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Super M higher · +109 ci (+70%)454155 ci
Super M264 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
454 is in the 42nd percentile; Super M is in the 74th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied4544
Super M4
Median Utility Tractor4
454 is in the 50th percentile; Super M is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 454 higher · +3 (+60%)4548
Super M5
Median Utility Tractor12
454 is in the 23rd percentile; Super M is in the 6th · 4,941 models
454 (A)Super M (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Farmall Super M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Farmall | — |
| Model | 454 | Super M | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Farmall Super M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | International Harvester | — |
| Model | CF4B35T | C264 | — |
| Power Output | 45hp | 44.3hp | ▲ 454+0.7 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 1,450RPM | ▲ 454+950 RPM · +66% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 155ci | 264ci | ▲ Super M+109 ci · +70% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.2in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Farmall Super M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Shuttle | Sliding Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Farmall Super M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 167in | 134in | ▲ 454+33 in · +25% |
| Width | 61in | 84.3in | ▲ Super M+23.3 in · +38% |
| Height | 90.6in | 78.7in | ▲ 454+11.9 in · +15% |
| Operating Weight | 4,365lb | 5,603lb | ▲ Super M+1,238 lb · +28% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Farmall Super M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | IH Lift-All | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Farmall Super M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Farmall Super M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.5x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 12.4x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Farmall Super M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | IH Lift-All | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Farmall Super M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential Mechanical Dry Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Farmall Super M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Farmall Super M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Farmall Super M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 39th percentile (45 hp)B · 38th percentile (44.3 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 42nd percentile (155 ci)B · 74th percentile (264 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 6th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 42nd percentile (4,365 lb)B · 52nd percentile (5,603 lb)
A · 454B · Super MMedian Utility Tractor