Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 454 vs Fendt Farmer 201S
FendtModel B
Fendt Farmer 201S
Utility
- power
- 45 hp
- displacement
- 172 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 13
ApolloApollo 454
vs
FendtFendt Farmer 201S
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied45445 hp
Farmer 201S45 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
454 is in the 39th percentile; Farmer 201S is in the 39th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmer 201S higher · +17 ci (+11%)454155 ci
Farmer 201S172 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
454 is in the 42nd percentile; Farmer 201S is in the 46th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 454 higher · +1 (+33%)4544
Farmer 201S3
Median Utility Tractor4
454 is in the 50th percentile; Farmer 201S is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmer 201S higher · +5 (+63%)4548
Farmer 201S13
Median Utility Tractor12
454 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmer 201S is in the 63rd · 4,941 models
454 (A)Farmer 201S (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Fendt Farmer 201S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Fendt | — |
| Model | 454 | Farmer 201S | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Fendt Farmer 201S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | KHD | — |
| Model | CF4B35T | F3L912 | — |
| Power Output | 45hp | 45hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 454+400 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 454+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 155ci | 172ci | ▲ Farmer 201S+17 ci · +11% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Fendt Farmer 201S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Shuttle | Gear type | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Fendt Farmer 201S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 167in | 136in | ▲ 454+31 in · +23% |
| Width | 61in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 90.6in | 92.1in | ▲ Farmer 201S+1.5 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 4,365lb | 4,443lb | ▲ Farmer 201S+78 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Fendt Farmer 201S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Fendt Farmer 201S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.5x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 12.4x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Fendt Farmer 201S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 3,396lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Fendt Farmer 201S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Fendt Farmer 201S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 39th percentile (45 hp)B · 39th percentile (45 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 42nd percentile (155 ci)B · 46th percentile (172 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 63rd percentile (13)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 42nd percentile (4,365 lb)B · 43rd percentile (4,443 lb)
A · 454B · Farmer 201SMedian Utility Tractor