Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 454 vs McCormick-Deering TD-35
Image not recorded
McCormick-DeeringModel B
McCormick-Deering TD-35
Crawler
- power
- 43.5 hp
- displacement
- 414 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 5
ApolloApollo 454
vs
McCormick-DeeringMcCormick-Deering TD-35
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 454 higher · +1.5 hp (+3%)45445 hp
TD-3543.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
454 is in the 39th percentile; TD-35 is in the 37th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TD-35 higher · +259 ci (+167%)454155 ci
TD-35414 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
454 is in the 42nd percentile; TD-35 is in the 91st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied4544
TD-354
Median Utility Tractor4
454 is in the 50th percentile; TD-35 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 454 higher · +3 (+60%)4548
TD-355
Median Utility Tractor12
454 is in the 23rd percentile; TD-35 is in the 6th · 4,941 models
454 (A)TD-35 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick-Deering TD-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | McCormick-Deering | — |
| Model | 454 | TD-35 | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler, Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick-Deering TD-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | International Harvester | — |
| Model | CF4B35T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 45hp | 43.5hp | ▲ 454+1.5 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 1,100RPM | ▲ 454+1,300 RPM · +118% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 155ci | 414ci | ▲ TD-35+259 ci · +167% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.8in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 6.5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick-Deering TD-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Shuttle | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick-Deering TD-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 167in | 133in | ▲ 454+34 in · +26% |
| Width | 61in | 59.5in | ▲ 454+1.5 in · +3% |
| Height | 90.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,365lb | 11,245lb | ▲ TD-35+6,880 lb · +158% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick-Deering TD-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick-Deering TD-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.5x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 12.4x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick-Deering TD-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick-Deering TD-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Crawler | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick-Deering TD-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick-Deering TD-35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 13gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 39th percentile (45 hp)B · 37th percentile (43.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 42nd percentile (155 ci)B · 91st percentile (414 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 6th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 42nd percentile (4,365 lb)B · 89th percentile (11,245 lb)
A · 454B · TD-35Median Utility Tractor