Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 454 vs McCormick Intl CT50U
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl CT50U
Utility
- power
- 43 hp
- displacement
- 153 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
ApolloApollo 454
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl CT50U
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 454 higher · +2 hp (+5%)45445 hp
CT50U43 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
454 is in the 39th percentile; CT50U is in the 37th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 454 higher · +2 ci (+1%)454155 ci
CT50U153 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
454 is in the 42nd percentile; CT50U is in the 41st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied4544
CT50U4
Median Utility Tractor4
454 is in the 50th percentile; CT50U is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ CT50U higher · +8 (+100%)4548
CT50U16
Median Utility Tractor12
454 is in the 23rd percentile; CT50U is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
454 (A)CT50U (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 454 | CT50U | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | CF4B35T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 45hp | 43hp | ▲ 454+2 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ CT50U+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 155ci | 153ci | ▲ 454+2 ci · +1% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.5in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Shuttle | Mechanical shuttle shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 167in | 125in | ▲ 454+42 in · +34% |
| Width | 61in | 65.7in | ▲ CT50U+4.7 in · +8% |
| Height | 90.6in | 94.4in | ▲ CT50U+3.8 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 4,365lb | 5,005lb | ▲ CT50U+640 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.5x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 12.4x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | Category I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 454 | McCormick Intl CT50U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 39th percentile (45 hp)B · 37th percentile (43 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 42nd percentile (155 ci)B · 41st percentile (153 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 42nd percentile (4,365 lb)B · 48th percentile (5,005 lb)
A · 454B · CT50UMedian Utility Tractor