Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 454 vs Yanmar F475
Image not recorded
YanmarModel B
Yanmar F475
Sub-Compact
- power
- 46.4 hp
- displacement
- 158 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 24
ApolloApollo 454
vs
YanmarYanmar F475
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ F475 higher · +1.4 hp (+3%)45445 hp
F47546.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
454 is in the 39th percentile; F475 is in the 41st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ F475 higher · +3 ci (+2%)454155 ci
F475158 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
454 is in the 42nd percentile; F475 is in the 42nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 454 higher · +1 (+33%)4544
F4753
Median Utility Tractor4
454 is in the 50th percentile; F475 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ F475 higher · +16 (+200%)4548
F47524
Median Utility Tractor12
454 is in the 23rd percentile; F475 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
454 (A)F475 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Yanmar F475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 454 | F475 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Yanmar F475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Yanmar | — |
| Model | CF4B35T | 3TN100 | — |
| Power Output | 45hp | 46.4hp | ▲ F475+1.4 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ F475+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 454+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 155ci | 158ci | ▲ F475+3 ci · +2% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.3in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Yanmar F475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Shuttle | Shuttle | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Yanmar F475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 167in | 138in | ▲ 454+29 in · +21% |
| Width | 61in | 63in | ▲ F475+2 in · +3% |
| Height | 90.6in | 92.5in | ▲ F475+1.9 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 4,365lb | 4,211lb | ▲ 454+154 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Yanmar F475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Yanmar F475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 6.5x16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 12.4x24 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Yanmar F475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type I | JIS1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Yanmar F475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Yanmar F475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Apollo 454 | Yanmar F475 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.1gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 39th percentile (45 hp)B · 41st percentile (46.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 42nd percentile (155 ci)B · 42nd percentile (158 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 42nd percentile (4,365 lb)B · 40th percentile (4,211 lb)
A · 454B · F475Median Utility Tractor