Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 554 vs Challenger MT297
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT297
Utility
- power
- 55.3 hp
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
ApolloApollo 554
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT297
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT297 higher · +0.3 hp (<1%)55455 hp
MT29755.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
554 is in the 50th percentile; MT297 is in the 50th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 554 higher · +9 ci (+5%)554182 ci
MT297173 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
554 is in the 50th percentile; MT297 is in the 46th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied5544
MT2974
Median Utility Tractor4
554 is in the 50th percentile; MT297 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT297 higher · +4 (+50%)5548
MT29712
Median Utility Tractor12
554 is in the 23rd percentile; MT297 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
554 (A)MT297 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 554 | Challenger MT297 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Challenger | — |
| Model | 554 | MT297 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 554 | Challenger MT297 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Iseki | — |
| Model | Xinchai 498BT | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 55hp | 55.3hp | ▲ MT297+0.3 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ MT297+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 182ci | 173ci | ▲ 554+9 ci · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 554 | Challenger MT297 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Shuttle | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 554 | Challenger MT297 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 191in | 137in | ▲ 554+54 in · +39% |
| Width | 65in | 71.5in | ▲ MT297+6.5 in · +10% |
| Height | 98.4in | 95.5in | ▲ 554+2.9 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 6,239lb | 3,878lb | ▲ 554+2,361 lb · +61% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 554 | Challenger MT297 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 554 | Challenger MT297 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 3 Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,600lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 554 | Challenger MT297 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 554 | Challenger MT297 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 554 | Challenger MT297 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 50th percentile (55 hp)B · 50th percentile (55.3 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 50th percentile (182 ci)B · 46th percentile (173 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 59th percentile (6,239 lb)B · 35th percentile (3,878 lb)
A · 554B · MT297Median Utility Tractor