Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs CaseIH 885
Image not recorded
ApolloApollo 854
vs
CaseIHCaseIH 885
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +1 hp (+1%)85485 hp
88584 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; 885 is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 885 higher · +33 ci (+14%)854235 ci
885268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; 885 is in the 75th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
8854
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; 885 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 854 higher · +2 (+25%)85410
8858
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; 885 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
854 (A)885 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 854 | 885 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Case International | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | D268 | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 84hp | ▲ 854+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 885+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 268ci | ▲ 885+33 ci · +14% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Synchro | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 142in | ▲ 854+82 in · +58% |
| Width | 78.7in | 72.8in | ▲ 854+5.9 in · +8% |
| Height | 110in | 97.2in | ▲ 854+12.8 in · +13% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 7,364lb | ▲ 854+2,996 lb · +41% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent dual shaft | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Independent hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.6gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH 885 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 74th percentile (84 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 75th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 70th percentile (7,364 lb)
A · 854B · 885Median Utility Tractor