Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs CaseIH Farmall 85C
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 85C
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
ApolloApollo 854
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 85C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +1 hp (+1%)85485 hp
Farmall 85C84 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; Farmall 85C is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 85C higher · +39 ci (+17%)854235 ci
Farmall 85C274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; Farmall 85C is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
Farmall 85C4
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 85C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmall 85C higher · +6 (+60%)85410
Farmall 85C16
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; Farmall 85C is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
854 (A)Farmall 85C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 854 | Farmall 85C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 84hp | ▲ 854+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Farmall 85C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 274ci | ▲ Farmall 85C+39 ci · +17% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.2in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Mechanical Shuttle / Power Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 78.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 110in | 77.8in | ▲ 854+32.2 in · +41% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 6,503lb | ▲ 854+3,857 lb · +59% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH Farmall 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS/Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 74th percentile (84 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 61st percentile (6,503 lb)
A · 854B · Farmall 85CMedian Utility Tractor