Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs CaseIH JX90U
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH JX90U
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 239 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
ApolloApollo 854
vs
CaseIHCaseIH JX90U
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +1 hp (+1%)85485 hp
JX90U84 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; JX90U is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ JX90U higher · +4 ci (+2%)854235 ci
JX90U239 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; JX90U is in the 65th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
JX90U4
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; JX90U is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ JX90U higher · +14 (+140%)85410
JX90U24
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; JX90U is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
854 (A)JX90U (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JX90U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 854 | JX90U | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JX90U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Iveco | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 84hp | ▲ 854+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ JX90U+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 239ci | ▲ JX90U+4 ci · +2% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JX90U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JX90U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 78.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 110in | 109in | ▲ 854+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 8,070lb | ▲ 854+2,290 lb · +28% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JX90U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JX90U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JX90U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JX90U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JX90U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 74th percentile (84 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 65th percentile (239 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 76th percentile (8,070 lb)
A · 854B · JX90UMedian Utility Tractor