Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs CaseIH JXU 85
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH JXU 85
Utility
- power
- 84.5 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
ApolloApollo 854
vs
CaseIHCaseIH JXU 85
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +0.5 hp (<1%)85485 hp
JXU 8584.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; JXU 85 is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ JXU 85 higher · +39 ci (+17%)854235 ci
JXU 85274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; JXU 85 is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
JXU 854
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; JXU 85 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ JXU 85 higher · +2 (+20%)85410
JXU 8512
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; JXU 85 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
854 (A)JXU 85 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JXU 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | CaseIH | — |
| Model | 854 | JXU 85 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JXU 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Iveco | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | NEF F4C | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 84.5hp | ▲ 854+0.5 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ JXU 85+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 274ci | ▲ JXU 85+39 ci · +17% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.2in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JXU 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JXU 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 78.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 110in | 107in | ▲ 854+3 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 8,929lb | ▲ 854+1,431 lb · +16% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JXU 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JXU 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JXU 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JXU 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 854 | CaseIH JXU 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 74th percentile (84.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 81st percentile (8,929 lb)
A · 854B · JXU 85Median Utility Tractor