Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs Deutz-Fahr 4090E
Deutz-FahrModel B
Deutz-Fahr 4090E
Utility
- power
- 82.6 hp
- displacement
- 176 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 15
ApolloApollo 854
vs
Deutz-FahrDeutz-Fahr 4090E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +2.4 hp (+3%)85485 hp
4090E82.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; 4090E is in the 73rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 854 higher · +59 ci (+34%)854235 ci
4090E176 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; 4090E is in the 47th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 854 higher · +1 (+33%)8544
4090E3
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; 4090E is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 4090E higher · +5 (+50%)85410
4090E15
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; 4090E is in the 64th · 4,941 models
854 (A)4090E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz-Fahr 4090E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Deutz-Fahr | — |
| Model | 854 | 4090E | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz-Fahr 4090E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | SDF | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | FARMotion KD3TA | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 82.6hp | ▲ 854+2.4 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 854+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 235ci | 176ci | ▲ 854+59 ci · +34% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz-Fahr 4090E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz-Fahr 4090E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 152in | ▲ 854+72 in · +47% |
| Width | 78.7in | 71.8in | ▲ 854+6.9 in · +10% |
| Height | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 6,614lb | ▲ 854+3,746 lb · +57% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz-Fahr 4090E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz-Fahr 4090E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz-Fahr 4090E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Deutz-Fahr 4090E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 73rd percentile (82.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 47th percentile (176 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 64th percentile (15)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 63rd percentile (6,614 lb)
A · 854B · 4090EMedian Utility Tractor