Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs Fendt Favorit 610S
FendtModel B
Fendt Favorit 610S
Agricultural
- power
- 85 hp
- displacement
- 317 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
ApolloApollo 854
vs
FendtFendt Favorit 610S
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied85485 hp
Favorit 610S85 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; Favorit 610S is in the 75th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Favorit 610S higher · +82 ci (+35%)854235 ci
Favorit 610S317 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; Favorit 610S is in the 85th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Favorit 610S higher · +2 (+50%)8544
Favorit 610S6
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; Favorit 610S is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Favorit 610S higher · +2 (+20%)85410
Favorit 610S12
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; Favorit 610S is in the 50th · 4,941 models
854 (A)Favorit 610S (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Fendt Favorit 610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Fendt | — |
| Model | 854 | Favorit 610S | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Fendt Favorit 610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | MWM | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | D225-6 | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 85hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Favorit 610S+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ Favorit 610S+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 235ci | 317ci | ▲ Favorit 610S+82 ci · +35% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.7in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Fendt Favorit 610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Fendt Favorit 610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 173in | ▲ 854+51 in · +29% |
| Width | 78.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 110in | 100in | ▲ 854+10 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 8,775lb | ▲ 854+1,585 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Fendt Favorit 610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Fendt Favorit 610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Fendt Favorit 610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Fendt Favorit 610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 75th percentile (85 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 85th percentile (317 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 81st percentile (8,775 lb)
A · 854B · Favorit 610SMedian Utility Tractor