Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs John Deere 310J
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 310J
Specialized
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 275 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
ApolloApollo 854
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 310J
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +1 hp (+1%)85485 hp
310J84 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; 310J is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 310J higher · +40 ci (+17%)854235 ci
310J275 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; 310J is in the 80th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
310J4
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; 310J is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 854 higher · +6 (+150%)85410
310J4
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; 310J is in the 4th · 4,941 models
854 (A)310J (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | John Deere | — |
| Model | 854 | 310J | — |
| Category | Utility | Specialized, Backhoe Loader | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | John Deere | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | 4045 | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 84hp | ▲ 854+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 854+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 275ci | ▲ 310J+40 ci · +17% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.2in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Full powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 279in | ▲ 310J+55 in · +25% |
| Width | 78.7in | 85.8in | ▲ 310J+7.1 in · +9% |
| Height | 110in | 108in | ▲ 854+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 13,880lb | ▲ 310J+3,520 lb · +34% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 310J | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS or Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 74th percentile (84 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 80th percentile (275 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 92nd percentile (13,880 lb)
A · 854B · 310JMedian Utility Tractor