Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs John Deere 410D
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 410D
Specialized
- power
- 85 hp
- displacement
- 276 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
ApolloApollo 854
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 410D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied85485 hp
410D85 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; 410D is in the 75th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 410D higher · +41 ci (+17%)854235 ci
410D276 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; 410D is in the 81st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
410D4
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; 410D is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 854 higher · +6 (+150%)85410
410D4
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; 410D is in the 4th · 4,941 models
854 (A)410D (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 410D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | John Deere | — |
| Model | 854 | 410D | — |
| Category | Utility | Specialized, Backhoe Loader | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 410D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | John Deere | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | 4045T | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 85hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 276ci | ▲ 410D+41 ci · +17% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.2in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 410D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 410D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 281in | ▲ 410D+57 in · +25% |
| Width | 78.7in | 85.8in | ▲ 410D+7.1 in · +9% |
| Height | 110in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 15,609lb | ▲ 410D+5,249 lb · +51% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 410D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 410D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 410D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 410D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 410D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4.2gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 410D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Four-post ROPS or Cab (optional) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 75th percentile (85 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 81st percentile (276 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 93rd percentile (15,609 lb)
A · 854B · 410DMedian Utility Tractor