Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs John Deere 5090M
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 5090M
Utility
- power
- 84.4 hp
- displacement
- 276 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
ApolloApollo 854
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 5090M
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +0.6 hp (<1%)85485 hp
5090M84.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; 5090M is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5090M higher · +41 ci (+17%)854235 ci
5090M276 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; 5090M is in the 81st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
5090M4
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; 5090M is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 5090M higher · +6 (+60%)85410
5090M16
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; 5090M is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
854 (A)5090M (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | John Deere | — |
| Model | 854 | 5090M | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | John Deere | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | 4045PWL | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 84.4hp | ▲ 854+0.6 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 276ci | ▲ 5090M+41 ci · +17% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.2in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Power shift, Partially synchronized, Power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 150in | ▲ 854+74 in · +49% |
| Width | 78.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 110in | 103in | ▲ 854+7 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 9,790lb | ▲ 854+570 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | Not recorded | 19.4gpm | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | 540/540E | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 320/85R24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 460/85R30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 FWA | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4x4 FWA | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 5090M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 74th percentile (84.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 81st percentile (276 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 85th percentile (9,790 lb)
A · 854B · 5090MMedian Utility Tractor