Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs John Deere 90F
John DeereModel B
John Deere 90F
Agricultural
- power
- 82 hp
- displacement
- 275 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
ApolloApollo 854
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 90F
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +3 hp (+4%)85485 hp
90F82 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; 90F is in the 73rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 90F higher · +40 ci (+17%)854235 ci
90F275 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; 90F is in the 80th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
90F4
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; 90F is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 90F higher · +6 (+60%)85410
90F16
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; 90F is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
854 (A)90F (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 90F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | John Deere | — |
| Model | 854 | 90F | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | — |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 90F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | John Deere | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 82hp | ▲ 854+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 90F+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 275ci | ▲ 90F+40 ci · +17% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.2in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 90F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 90F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 126in | ▲ 854+98 in · +78% |
| Width | 78.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 110in | 85.9in | ▲ 854+24.1 in · +28% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 5,908lb | ▲ 854+4,452 lb · +75% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 90F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 90F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 90F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | John Deere 90F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 73rd percentile (82 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 80th percentile (275 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 55th percentile (5,908 lb)
A · 854B · 90FMedian Utility Tractor