Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs Kubota M8200
KubotaModel B
Kubota M8200
Utility
- power
- 82 hp
- displacement
- 203 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
ApolloApollo 854
vs
KubotaKubota M8200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +3 hp (+4%)85485 hp
M820082 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; M8200 is in the 73rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 854 higher · +32 ci (+16%)854235 ci
M8200203 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; M8200 is in the 55th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
M82004
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; M8200 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 854 higher · +2 (+25%)85410
M82008
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; M8200 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
854 (A)M8200 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Kubota M8200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Kubota | — |
| Model | 854 | M8200 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Kubota M8200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Kubota | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | V3300-TE | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 82hp | ▲ 854+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ M8200+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 203ci | ▲ 854+32 ci · +16% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.9in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.3in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Kubota M8200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Synchronized shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Kubota M8200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 153in | ▲ 854+71 in · +46% |
| Width | 78.7in | 78in | ▲ 854+0.7 in · <1% |
| Height | 110in | 97.4in | ▲ 854+12.6 in · +13% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 5,585lb | ▲ 854+4,775 lb · +85% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Kubota M8200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Kubota M8200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent with hydraulic wet disc clutch | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Kubota M8200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 5,500lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Kubota M8200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Multiple wet disc mechanical | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Kubota M8200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Kubota M8200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.4gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Kubota M8200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post folding ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 73rd percentile (82 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 55th percentile (203 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 52nd percentile (5,585 lb)
A · 854B · M8200Median Utility Tractor