Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs Landini 8860
Image not recorded
LandiniModel B
Landini 8860
Utility
- power
- 83.6 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
ApolloApollo 854
vs
LandiniLandini 8860
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +1.4 hp (+2%)85485 hp
886083.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; 8860 is in the 73rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8860 higher · +34 ci (+14%)854235 ci
8860269 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; 8860 is in the 77th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
88604
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; 8860 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 8860 higher · +2 (+20%)85410
886012
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; 8860 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
854 (A)8860 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Landini 8860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Landini | — |
| Model | 854 | 8860 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Landini 8860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Perkins | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | 4.4L 4-cyl diesel | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 83.6hp | ▲ 854+1.4 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 269ci | ▲ 8860+34 ci · +14% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Landini 8860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Landini 8860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 150in | ▲ 854+74 in · +49% |
| Width | 78.7in | 73.6in | ▲ 854+5.1 in · +7% |
| Height | 110in | 102in | ▲ 854+8 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 6,950lb | ▲ 854+3,410 lb · +49% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Landini 8860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Landini 8860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Landini 8860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Landini 8860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Landini 8860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open operator station with ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 73rd percentile (83.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 77th percentile (269 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 67th percentile (6,950 lb)
A · 854B · 8860Median Utility Tractor