Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs Massey Ferguson 3640F
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 3640F
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ApolloApollo 854
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 3640F
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 854 higher · +1 hp (+1%)85485 hp
3640F84 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; 3640F is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 854 higher · +34 ci (+17%)854235 ci
3640F201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; 3640F is in the 54th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 854 higher · +1 (+33%)8544
3640F3
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; 3640F is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 854 higher · +3,801 lb (+58%)85410,360 lb
3640F6,559 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
854 is in the 87th percentile; 3640F is in the 62nd · 5,107 models
854 (A)3640F (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 854 | 3640F | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | 33CTA | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 84hp | ▲ 854+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 854+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 235ci | 201ci | ▲ 854+34 ci · +17% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.3in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 157in | ▲ 854+67 in · +43% |
| Width | 78.7in | 57.1in | ▲ 854+21.6 in · +38% |
| Height | 110in | 90.6in | ▲ 854+19.4 in · +21% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 6,559lb | ▲ 854+3,801 lb · +58% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 74th percentile (84 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 54th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 62nd percentile (6,559 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 95th percentile (224 in)B · 73rd percentile (157 in)
A · 854B · 3640FMedian Utility Tractor