Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Apollo 854 vs Massey Ferguson 5290
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 5290
Utility
- power
- 88 hp
- displacement
- 250 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 18
ApolloApollo 854
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 5290
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 5290 higher · +3 hp (+4%)85485 hp
529088 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
854 is in the 75th percentile; 5290 is in the 76th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5290 higher · +15 ci (+6%)854235 ci
5290250 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
854 is in the 63rd percentile; 5290 is in the 71st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8544
52904
Median Utility Tractor4
854 is in the 50th percentile; 5290 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 5290 higher · +8 (+80%)85410
529018
Median Utility Tractor12
854 is in the 39th percentile; 5290 is in the 83rd · 4,941 models
854 (A)5290 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 5290 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apollo | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 854 | 5290 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 5290 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Changfa | Perkins | — |
| Model | CF4C80T | 4.41 | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 88hp | ▲ 5290+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 235ci | 250ci | ▲ 5290+15 ci · +6% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 5290 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 5290 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 224in | 157in | ▲ 854+67 in · +43% |
| Width | 78.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 110in | 104in | ▲ 854+6 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 10,360lb | 10,362lb | ▲ 5290+2 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 5290 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 5290 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 5290 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Apollo 854 | Massey Ferguson 5290 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 76th percentile (88 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (235 ci)B · 71st percentile (250 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 83rd percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 87th percentile (10,360 lb)B · 87th percentile (10,362 lb)
A · 854B · 5290Median Utility Tractor